Skip to main content
Politics

Federal judge sides with Texas, blocks federal emergency abortion guidance

Aug 24, 2022

Share

A federal judge in Texas blocked the enforcement of emergency abortion guidance from the Department of Health and Human Services. It requires hospitals to provide emergency abortions to women despite state laws or a physician’s religious beliefs on performing the procedure. In Texas, that guidance no longer applies after a judge ruled it was unauthorized and “well beyond” the text of the law, which is “silent on abortion”.

The Biden Administration has been taking steps to reinforce existing laws that could undermine state bans on abortions, including the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act. The federal law requires anyone coming to an emergency department to be stabilized and treated, regardless of their insurance status. President Biden and the DHHS referred to this law as guidance for emergency rooms to still perform abortions in emergencies. However, the federal judge in Texas said the abortion guidance ignores the emergency health risks of the unborn child.

“Under HHS’s reading, if the doctor initially determines that the unborn child does not have an emergency medical condition, the doctor must then close his or her eyes to the unborn child’s health for the remainder of the treatment. This directly conflicts with the doctor’s ongoing duty to provide care for both the mother and the unborn child when stabilizing a pregnant woman,” US District Judge James Wesley Hendrix said in a statement. “Because the doctor has a duty to both, EMTALA does not require the doctor to introduce an emergency medical condition to one in order to stabilize the other. Again, EMTALA does not say how to balance both interests. It leaves that determination to the doctor, who is bound by state law.”

The decision further protects the state’s pro-life stance. Texas banned abortions performed after a heartbeat could be detected, before Roe was even overturned, through the Heartbeat Bill. The back and forth battle between state and federal decisions on abortion is likely only beginning and will only heat up as it is used as a political pawn come midterms.

TEXAS LED THE WAY ON ABORTION BANS.
NOW A FEDERAL ATTEMPT TO ALLOW ABORTIONS TO CONTINUE—
AND OVERRIDE THE STATE — HAS BEEN BLOCKED BY A JUDGE.
FOLLOWING THE OVERTURNING OF ROE…
THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION HAS TAKEN STEPS TO REINFORCE EXISTING LAWS.
EMERGENCY ROOMS HAVE TO ABORT A CHILD IF THE WOMAN’S LIFE IS THREATENED…
REGARDLESS OF STATE LAW OR THE DOCTOR’S RELIGIOUS BELIEFS ON PERFORMING THE PROCEDURE.
TEXAS IMMEDIATELY SUED.
A FEDERAL JUDGE HAS SIDED WITH THE STATE.
SAYING A DOCTOR HAS TO WEIGH THE EMERGENCY HEALTH RISKS OF BOTH THE MOTHER **AND UNBORN CHILD.
FURTHER PROTECTING THE STATE’S PRO-LIFE STANCE.
ABORTION HAS BECOME A KEY ISSUE FOR DEMOCRATS HEADING INTO MIDTERMS.
THE BACK AND FORTH BATTLE BETWEEN STATE AND FEDERAL DECISIONS ON ABORTION IS LIKELY ONLY BEGINNING.