Skip to main content
U.S.

Lawyer: Trump won’t be charged

Jun 29, 2021

Share

After a Monday meeting with the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office, lawyers for the Trump Organization say former President Donald Trump will not personally be charged this week in connection to the office’s investigation into the organization.

The purpose of Monday’s meeting was for the lawyers to make a final pitch against indicting the organization. A vote on indictment is expected later this week.

While former President Trump will not be charged this week, the two-year-long investigation into his business affairs is ongoing. “I can’t say he’s out of the woods yet completely,” Trump Organization lawyer Ron Fischetti told The Associated Press in a phone interview.

In recent months, district attorney investigators have focused on fringe benefits the company gave to top executives, such as use of apartments, cars and school tuition.

David Shapiro, a professor at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York, said it’s easier to hold a company liable than a person in these types of cases involving large corporations.

“Sometimes, you know the act, the final acts are wrong: false tax returns. But you don’t always know who really pulled the trigger on submitting it to the New York state authorities and did that person know that he or she was submitting a fraudulent tax return,” Shapiro said. “So, if you don’t know, you go after the corporation because overall, on the whole, somebody did something seriously wrong. Somebody has to make restitution. So, the corporation, for lack of any other available body of responsibility, has to carry the weight.”

Meanwhile, the former president is sounding off on the district attorney’s office, calling it “rude, nasty, and totally biased in the way they are treating lawyers, representatives, and some of the wonderful long-term employees and people within the Trump Organization.”

“After hundreds of subpoenas, over 3 million pages of documents, 4 years of searching, dozens and dozens of interviews, and millions of dollars of taxpayer funds wasted, they continue to be ‘in search of a crime,’” Trump said.

He called the investigation a “continuation of the greatest Witch Hunt of all time.”

David Shapiro, Professor at John Jay College of Criminal Justice: “The investigation of the Trump organization largely began with Ms. Letitia James’ office, the New York attorney general’s office, as a civil investigation. And most recently, she ceded the authority to the district attorney’s office to merge her investigation with theirs and theirs is a criminal investigation, which, of course, would carry way more significant consequences should any person or corporation be held liable. It’s easier to prove liability on the part of the corporation than to prove liability on the part of any given individual, especially in a corporation that normally has a great series of checks and balances. Sometimes, you know the act, the final acts are wrong: false tax returns. But you don’t always know who really pulled the trigger on submitting it to the New York state authorities and did that person know that he or she was submitting a fraudulent tax return. So, if you don’t know, you go after the corporation because overall, on the whole, somebody did something seriously wrong. Somebody has to make restitution. So, the corporation, for lack of any other available body of responsibility, has to carry the weight. The remedies for seeking to hold the corporation, and not individuals, responsible is really a focus on the future and a focus on making sure that the wrongdoing does not continue at the corporate level.  it follows, like many other investigations, until there will be attempts made to persuade individuals or an individual on the inside to share testimonial evidence as to who knew what when and to provide context to things that can be ambiguous, whether emails, recorded telephone conversations. The cooperating witness will provide the necessary detail from which specific responsibility can be determined and proven.”