And why do I care so much about agricultural shipments? I mean, Ukraine only has one waterfrontage, it’s got to pull into the Northwest and Romania to the southwest. Why can’t it ship stuff by land? Well, agricultural products really doesn’t matter what it is, have a very high weight and bulk to value ratio. So transport really is important from a cost point of view. And on average, as you know, for me, plus blah, blah, blah in forever, it costs about 12 times as much to ship anything by truck as it does by water. And so Odessa and KEARSON are the big blue water ports in the area has always been easier in the Russian and Ukrainian spaces to get the stuff on water wherever you can, and send it out. In this case, others another problem. There are real connections that go into the countries to Ukraine’s West, and some grain has gone there. But two problems number one, there’s not nearly enough of them and capacity is limited. So you’re talking about maybe one sis of Ukraine’s pre war grain could have made it out through the Western zones by rail. But problem number two, the rail gauge is different. So once these carriages get to the border, they either need to be on a special kind of carriage where you can adjust the rail gauge car by car at the border, or you need to switch the cargo to a new carriage in order to go into Europe. And I guess there’s a third problem to what has happened for the first year is in order to maximize that 20% They’d be going into Romania or Poland or Hungary, and then they dump their cargo and then the rail cars would come back empty to get loaded up again. That is what allows Ukraine to hit that 20% Number. The problem is Romania and Hungary and especially Poland are all green producers and exporters. And all this Ukrainian green getting dumped on the local market was pushing down the costs of local grain and forcing the poles the Hungarians and Romanians to then increase their shipments out. Well, that meant they had to pay the transport costs now as well. And it was starting to drive some local farmers out of business. So what we’ve seen in the last three months is most governments on the entire swath of European countries, that border or near Ukraine have stopped accepting Ukrainian cargo as an end destination, you can still trans ship, get it through, you can still get to a port no problem. But that means that the carriers it used to be able to do short back and forth now has to go all the way through these countries to get to another country or to get to the coast and then it takes up port space. And so that’s taking that 20% And probably cut it at least by a third, maybe as much as half. And the only solution to this that isn’t waterborne is to lay twice as many tracks or get a lot more rail cars. That’s not something you do in a few months. And so we are now looking at an environment where maybe 10% of Ukraine’s grain can out get out this year. And once the Russians actually start going after the infrastructure, especially in places like Odessa, those venues close off completely. So last year was probably the last year that Ukraine is going to be a significant producer of foodstuffs for the world. Next question.
Peter Zeihan
Share
. . .
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
More from Peter
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Here are the hard facts about de-dollarization
Friday
Peter Zeihan
Is Saudi Arabia ditching the US dollar for the Chinese yuan?
Friday
Peter Zeihan
Expect a last-minute compromise on the debt ceiling
Friday
Peter Zeihan
Do Americans blame Biden or Congress for the debt ceiling crisis?
Thursday
Dr. Frank Luntz
Why I’m concerned about Ukraine’s agriculture industry
May 18
Share
. . .
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
By
The EU has announced a Ukraine grain deal after five member countries banned Ukrainian imports following protests from local farmers. The deal allows Ukraine to transit agricultural produce through EU countries but not to sell there.
Although Russia has just extended the Black Sea grain deal for two months, allowing Ukraine’s grain exports to be transported by water, Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan explains why he thinks there are more hurdles ahead for Ukraine’s agriculture industry.
Excerpted from Peter’s May 18 “Zeihan on Geopolitics” newsletter:
The fourth question of the Q&A series is…why am I so worried about agriculture exports coming out of Ukraine?
Ukraine’s preferred route for its bulk wheat and maize exports has always been water — specifically via the Black Sea. Now you’re probably thinking, “Even with seaborne export routes being blocked by Russia, can’t Ukraine just send stuff by rail to neighboring countries?” Theoretically, yes, but there are a few problems.
There are two sizeable hurdles to overland transit. The first is limited rail capacity and differing infrastructure. Ukraine’s Soviet past means its rail lines are of a different gauge than most of Europe, forcing it to rely on aging legacy connectivity in Romania and Poland. And now there is a new issue on the horizon. As Ukraine started dumping more and more grain into its neighboring EU countries, the local economies took a hit, resulting in many of these countries refusing Ukrainian grain in support of their local farmers. It can still pass through, but it can’t stop there.
As Ukraine’s exports now need to go further, new infrastructure is required, and profits will get even lower. There isn’t a quick fix for this. To add insult to injury, Russia will soon target Ukrainian agricultural infrastructure — meaning last year was likely the last time Ukraine would be a significant producer of foodstuffs for the world.
And why do I care so much about agricultural shipments? I mean, Ukraine only has one waterfrontage, it’s got to pull into the Northwest and Romania to the southwest. Why can’t it ship stuff by land? Well, agricultural products really doesn’t matter what it is, have a very high weight and bulk to value ratio. So transport really is important from a cost point of view. And on average, as you know, for me, plus blah, blah, blah in forever, it costs about 12 times as much to ship anything by truck as it does by water. And so Odessa and KEARSON are the big blue water ports in the area has always been easier in the Russian and Ukrainian spaces to get the stuff on water wherever you can, and send it out. In this case, others another problem. There are real connections that go into the countries to Ukraine’s West, and some grain has gone there. But two problems number one, there’s not nearly enough of them and capacity is limited. So you’re talking about maybe one sis of Ukraine’s pre war grain could have made it out through the Western zones by rail. But problem number two, the rail gauge is different. So once these carriages get to the border, they either need to be on a special kind of carriage where you can adjust the rail gauge car by car at the border, or you need to switch the cargo to a new carriage in order to go into Europe. And I guess there’s a third problem to what has happened for the first year is in order to maximize that 20% They’d be going into Romania or Poland or Hungary, and then they dump their cargo and then the rail cars would come back empty to get loaded up again. That is what allows Ukraine to hit that 20% Number. The problem is Romania and Hungary and especially Poland are all green producers and exporters. And all this Ukrainian green getting dumped on the local market was pushing down the costs of local grain and forcing the poles the Hungarians and Romanians to then increase their shipments out. Well, that meant they had to pay the transport costs now as well. And it was starting to drive some local farmers out of business. So what we’ve seen in the last three months is most governments on the entire swath of European countries, that border or near Ukraine have stopped accepting Ukrainian cargo as an end destination, you can still trans ship, get it through, you can still get to a port no problem. But that means that the carriers it used to be able to do short back and forth now has to go all the way through these countries to get to another country or to get to the coast and then it takes up port space. And so that’s taking that 20% And probably cut it at least by a third, maybe as much as half. And the only solution to this that isn’t waterborne is to lay twice as many tracks or get a lot more rail cars. That’s not something you do in a few months. And so we are now looking at an environment where maybe 10% of Ukraine’s grain can out get out this year. And once the Russians actually start going after the infrastructure, especially in places like Odessa, those venues close off completely. So last year was probably the last year that Ukraine is going to be a significant producer of foodstuffs for the world. Next question.
Here are the hard facts about de-dollarization
Is the U.S. at risk of losing its global currency status? Given the Russian sanctions, tension with China, and most pressing, a looming deadline to raise the debt ceiling, the question is particularly relevant these days. Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan outlines the key characteristics that define a global currency, and argues most other
Friday
Is Saudi Arabia ditching the US dollar for the Chinese yuan?
For decades, the U.S. dollar has been the primary medium of exchange for international trade, but recent developments are impacting the dollar’s global dominance. China has been making efforts to replace the U.S. currency with its own, the yuan. Now Saudi Arabia is helping accelerate those efforts by agreeing to sell its oil to China
Friday
Expect a last-minute compromise on the debt ceiling
Americans can’t say they weren’t warned. According to Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, if Congress and the White House fail to reach an agreement to lift the limit on federal debt, the Treasury could start to miss payments on its obligations as early as June 1. A U.S. default would shatter the $24 trillion market for
Friday
How long will the Ukraine war last?
Everyone wants to know the answer to a question literally no one is capable of answering: When will the war in Ukraine end? For starters, experts say, it depends on how you define the end of the war. Some believe it will only end when Ukraine or Russia, or both, collapse, since it’s a matter
Tuesday
Besides Russia, is NATO also to blame for the war in Ukraine?
Several theories propose that NATO expansion played a role in motivating Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The argument suggests that as NATO expanded its reach into eastern Europe without explicitly excluding Ukrainian membership, Putin perceived a threat, leading to the initiation of the war. Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan challenges this notion and sheds light
May 19
more +
Stories each side is underreporting
Elon Musk meets Chinese FM in Beijing
11 sources | 14% from the left
UK government fights demand to hand over Boris Johnson’s messages to COVID-19 inquiry
23 sources | 13% from the right
Latest Stories
AP
Congress to debate, vote on debt ceiling deal before US default: May 30 rundown
Watch 6:22
22 mins ago
Getty Images
The EU is close to regulating AI. What about us?
Watch 4:02
23 hrs ago
AP
Biden, McCarthy strike deal to avoid default. Now it’s up to Congress.
Read
Yesterday
The Washington Post
Winnie-the-Pooh advises Texas students on active shooter situations
Watch 2:43
Friday
Reuters
Trump workers moved boxes day before FBI arrived seeking classified documents
Watch 2:07
Friday
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Sen. Tim Scott can move America past race-based politics
Friday
Star Parker
NAACP is right to warn Black people to avoid DeSantis’ Florida
Friday
Dr. Rashad Richey
DeSantis is right to oppose government subsidies for Disney
Thursday
Timothy Carney
It’s way past time Kamala Harris gets the credit she deserves
Thursday
Jordan Reid