Commentary
-
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Hello from central Wyoming. I wanted to take this opportunity to talk about Afghanistan one last time. There’s been a lot of talk going around about the Chinese being really excited about getting in so they can tap all the mineral resources of the country.
Um, no, uh, let’s assume for the moment that you believe the numbers that have been tossed around — that there’s two to three trillion dollars worth of ore which is backed by absolutely no meaningful studies or seismic work. There’s still the issue of getting it out now. Afghanistan from any place in the mountains to any place on the border to then getting to China. You’re talking about an excess of a 2,000-mile trip, plus 2,000 to 3,000 miles across trying to get where you need to go.
But it’s really that first piece within Afghanistan now. As those of you who have been following me for a while realize, moving things by land is about ten times as expensive as moving them by water.
And that assumes you have an American-style interstate highway system.
Now building a single mile of interstate highway costs $10 million to $20 million a mile.
And that assumes you’re in a relatively flat zone with a local skilled labor pool, there’s petroleum for the asphalt, as well as an efficient tax base and financing to make it all happen. Afghanistan has none of those things.
So there you’re talking to at least a factor of four or five more expensive.
So you’re talking a cool trillion dollars just to build the basic infrastructure to get into the mountains, get the stuff out, plus the cost of the mines.
You’re also not processing it anywhere in Afghanistan because, lo and behold, the country does not have a power grid.
So you’re going to be moving ore in trucks the size of dump trucks until you get to the Chinese border.
No. The infrastructure, just that question alone, um, kind of obviates it.
It’s just simply easier to move things in from Brazil or Australia, via the water.
Now the only reason that the Chinese do have to be involved in the areas, very simple, they’re concerned about what’s going to happen in the region when the Americans are gone. As long as the Americans were there, all the local jihadists were focused on the United States, whether it was some offshoot of ISIS, the group that launched the attack on the airport recently, or the Taliban itself.
But if you remove the Americans, then all of a sudden the local militant groups do one of two things.
They go after one another, which we’re going to see very soon, or they go after the regional powers for whatever reason they find problematic, that’s Pakistan, that’s India, that’s Russia, that’s China.
China’s not there because they want to be, they’re going to be there because they feel they have no choice. Kind of like why the U.S. went in, in the first place. Anyway, that’s it for me? See you from another mountain.
-
Can other nations replicate success of US shale revolution?
The “shale revolution” has provided the United States with a bountiful domestic supply of oil. But extracting oil from shale is a highly technical process, and it is also dependent on specific geological formations. Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan tackles the question of whether or not other nations might be able to replicate the…
-
Peace between Israel and Iran, at least for now
A series of recent airstrikes between Israel and Iran inflamed fears of a wider regional war erupting in the Middle East. That concern now seems to have paid off, after third-party countries around the world successfully intervened and talked down military hardliners in both Israel and Iran in order to avoid such an outcome. Israel’s…
-
Global internet in a precarious state, but that could be a positive
Over 500 underwater cables span over 870,000 miles worldwide, serving as the foundation of the modern global internet. Despite their critical role in facilitating communication, these cables often go unnoticed, even as the amount of data transmitted through them has surged. So what happens if the cables fail? Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan contends…
-
Water wars are an unlikely future
Foreign policy writers have long warned of the possibility that clean drinking water might become “the next oil” — that is, that major wars might be fought around the globe over access to potable water. With expanding populations and finite water supplies, these critics argue that humans will inevitably fight each other to secure drinking…
-
Are Russia’s hypersonic missiles too good to be true?
Russia has reportedly used five of its new hypersonic Zircon missiles to target Kyiv since the beginning of 2024. Russia claims that these sea-based missiles, boasting a range of 625 miles and capable of traveling at nine times the speed of sound, are part of its family of “superweapons” aimed at penetrating the U.S. missile…
Latest Stories
-
Supreme Court justices split over Idaho’s abortion law
-
Businesses sue over FTC ban on noncompetes
-
National Enquirer ex-publisher: Tabloid made up stories to help Trump
-
Bird flu fallout: USDA says milk is safe, states must test dairy herds
-
Biden administration cracks down on flight refunds and hidden fees
Popular Opinions
-
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Latest Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum. We hope these different voices will help you reach your own conclusions.
The opinions published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.
Latest Commentary
We know it is important to hear from a diverse range of observers on the complex topics we face and believe our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions.
The commentaries published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.
Peter Zeihan
Geopolitical StrategistPeace between Israel and Iran, at least for now
Global internet in a precarious state, but that could be a positive
Water wars are an unlikely future
Dr. Frank Luntz
Pollster and Political Analyst‘Take the job seriously’: Why Americans are fed up with Congress
‘If we can shrink it, it will stop growing’: Americans talk debt, deficit
‘I don’t think they care’: Undecided voters explain their reasons
Pete Ricketts
U.S. Senator for Nebraska