Commentary
-
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Biden’s afraid to criticize the China he profited from
If we’re about to witness a replay of Tiananmen Square amid the white paper revolution, what does the Biden administration plan to do about it? In October, the President and his national security strategy said that, quote, Americans will support universal human rights and stand in solidarity with those beyond our shores who seek freedom and dignity. Unquote. It’s not at all clear that this pledge to stand with the oppressed extends to China, judging by the administration’s muted, to say the least, response as Chinese citizens have taken to the streets amid widespread protests of Beijing’s draconian zero COVID policy and the tyrannical Chinese Communist Party behind it.
The White House delivered a passive and unsentimental message on China after the Thanksgiving holiday weekend, reiterated since, focusing more on the efficacy of Chinese Coronavirus policies than the hardships faced by those suffering under them and the right of the affected to dissent.
Not that anyone asked, but the administration emphasized that quote, zero COVID is not a policy we are pursuing, that it might not prove effective for China and that America’s favored public health tools are superior. As for the Chinese protesters, the administration simply affirmed that, quote, everyone has the right to peacefully protest including in the PRC. Wow, that’s bold. And another dispassionate statement by an NSC Spokesman John Kirby had the following exchange with Real Clear Politics is Phillip Wegmann.
The question is why the support for protesting but not for these protesters, protesters who as tanks rolled down the streets are undoubtedly putting their lives on the line and standing up against Xi. What causes the Biden administration to curl in a ball as the Chinese people chide a communist biomedical security state, under which their countrymen were left to perish to be burnt alive, allegedly behind doors the CCP sealed shut in a room.
It can’t be that Biden has a blanket policy of strict non-interference in others’ business. His White House has waded into the internal affairs of all from the Canadians to the Brazilians and the Hungarians to the Israelis. It hasn’t been bashful when it comes to, with public displays of affection, for some people facing down adversarial regimes like the Ukrainians.
It doesn’t seem the Biden administration fears that it will be accused of hypocrisy if it challenges totalitarian Chinese lockdown policies that merely represent the logical extreme ends of the very ones long embraced by its own officials. The administration made that clear when it focused in its initial statements on drawing a line between its favorite policies and China’s and could it be that Biden’s stated devotion to human rights is conditional?
Perhaps. It might weigh what it considers national security interests or economics, overtaking a moral stance in defense of liberty-minded protesters against tyrants who threaten to massacre them. Or it could be acting out of fear, fear that China will retaliate should Biden give voice to critics of the Gulag-operating CCP regime that is America’s most formidable adversary. But there’s still another factor looming in the background which ought to be front and center. That factor is the Biden family’s dubious dealings with our greatest adversaries led by Communist China, in which at minimum, his son and brother monetized Patriach Joe’s public office for private gain.
We don’t know the full scope of the dealings and the extent to which the big guy might have profited from them. But it’s well documented that during and after Joe Biden’s time as Vice President, when he managed a China portfolio that proved very favorable to Beijing, that his family exploited relationships with CCP-tied individuals and entities that generated an estimated more than $30 million for the Biden’s.
This after a career spent at the highest levels of the US government as Senator and then as Vice President, in which Biden gleefully, cheerfully helped facilitate China’s rise to our greatest adversary.
The Biden’s influence peddling creates conflicts for Joe that compromise him and us. Yet he has never been formally investigated, let alone held to account. And the big guy has also surrounded himself, by the way, with like-minded soft on China officials who themselves have demonstrated dubious ties to the CCP. We don’t know what will become of the white paper revolution, how organized the protesters are, who may be driving them, what their ultimate aims are, how the CCP will respond and who and what will prevail. We can and must debate what our national interest requires with respect to China and the brave dissidents that are challenging that regime, including how and to what extent we ought to engage in information fear and what we can realistically hope to achieve by public and private efforts in service of America’s national interests. But the buck stops with the President. He has more power than anyone. And given his family’s dealings and his obfuscation about them, we are left to question whether his private interest impacts his approach to the national interest with respect to China, and is therefore causing the administration to pull punches. One simply can’t sever the Biden family’s China ties from the Biden administration’s China policies. Those courageously taking on Xi Jinping in the streets today may well bear the brunt of them.
-
Supreme Court threatens free speech rights in Murthy case
The Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in Murthy v. Missouri, a case concerning government communications with social media companies, and whether those communications amount to censorship. The justices seem opposed to the plaintiff’s arguments that the government’s efforts to combat online misinformation about COVID-19 and U.S. elections constituted censorship. Straight Arrow News contributor Ben…
-
GOP House report exposes Jan. 6 panel and its witnesses
A new GOP House report investigating the bipartisan Jan. 6 committee accuses that committee of partisanship and questions some Jan. 6 witnesses. The report was chiefly authored by Rep. Barry Loudermilk, R-Ga, who has been accused of giving reconnaissance tours to domestic terrorists the day before the attack itself. Loudermilk says his report is important…
-
US government surveilling Americans’ finances is alarming
A recent report from House Republicans said that financial institutions cooperated with U.S. federal law enforcement while investigating potential or suspected extremists associated with the Jan. 6 attack. The report notes that keywords like “MAGA” and “Trump” were used to help filter through data and identify such persons. Advocates say that these filters were helpful,…
-
With or without Smirnov, Bidens are still corrupt
On Feb. 14, Alexander Smirnov, a key figure in the Republican impeachment inquiries against President Biden, was arrested and charged with lying to the FBI. The Department of Justice alleges that Smirnov’s claims, a key ingredient for much of the GOP investigation, are verifiably false and that Smirnov made those statements knowing that they were…
-
Is the Supreme Court caving on affirmative action?
Months after the Supreme Court rejected affirmative action in college admissions, Chief Justice John Roberts and a majority of justices declined to reconsider whether the updated admissions policy at Virginia’s Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology (TJ), one of the nation’s top-ranked high schools, discriminates against Asian Americans. A lower court’s decision supporting…
Latest Opinions
-
Trump attends wake for fallen NYPD officer Jonathan Diller
-
A robotic future: US Army considering a platoon of steel to save lives
-
US Army upgrading Bradley IFVs with Iron Fist
-
Congress wants to give all federal inmates an ID when they leave prison
-
FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried gets 25 years, must pay $11 billion to victims
Popular Opinions
-
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.