Commentary
-
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Recently Dr. Anthony Fauci announced that he would be leaving the government at the end of this year at age 80. He has been head of the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious diseases now for 38 years. Earlier in his career, he had done significant work…fighting the AIDS virus, and President Bush gave him the Presidential Medal of Freedom.
But age 80 and 38 years and recent events have indicated the problem with someone who is entrenched in power for that long.
A few examples.
Shortly after we began lockdowns in early March, the president asked the former CEA chair Kevin Hassett to go in and just give them a briefing on what he saw would happen to the economy. Hassett it laid out the facts. That the economy was falling at the fastest rate since the Great Depression, for example. The group assembled in the Roosevelt Room was stunned.
Everyone was quiet except Fauci, who had the first line – quote, “Am I still in charge here?” He felt a rendition to the facts was a challenge to his position. Shortly after the virus hit,
Fauci received information from his subordinate that there was a very good chance that the virus leaked from the Wuhan lab. Well, this was not going to be good for Fauci or his career. Once the Obama presidency’s ban on this kind of research was ended, Fauci sent money to the Wuhan lab. Then when it came out, he realized that all of the work he did, all such lab work, which turned out led to the virus, would become politically unpopular, and would basically end the main function that he was involved in.
He organized a publication in the magazine, “Nature.” He rallied all of the people who received his research to sign it. Well that then became the official line: That it had to have been developed in nature and not at the lab, even though the evidence even then suggested the opposite. Other views were suppressed. They…people who advocated the lab theory were banned from Facebook and Twitter, for example.
Later that year, there was a similar problem. A group of epidemiologists, leaders in their field, signed the Great Barrington Declaration. They included Professor Bhattacharya at Stanford, Professor Gupta at Oxford, Professor Kulldorff at Harvard. These are not fringe people.
But Fauci’s boss, Francis Collins, wrote him and said, “These are fringe epidemiologists. There needs to be a quick and devastating takedown of what they’re saying.”
Well, Fauci responded, “That campaign is already underway.” And so a smear campaign against these epidemiologists – and by the way, 1000s of doctors and epidemiologists signed the Declaration – continued. It was called disinformation and misinformation. Those words are still around. Facebook and Google banned these distinguished professors and any support for the Great Barrington Declaration.
This was plain old censorship.
Now, let’s see what got to Fauci’s head. He didn’t like being criticized on the economics. He didn’t like being criticized on the land leaked theory, he didn’t like being criticized in his opposition to the Great Barrington Declaration. Then he said, quote, “attacks on me are attacks on science.”
I’m sorry, Dr. Fauci. But censorship of opposing views is the antithesis of science. Your career may have had scientific benefit early on, but in the end, you ended up as the epitome of anti-science. This is Larry Lindsey for straight arrow News.
-
President Biden just isn’t cool
For some Americans, politics is only about policy, while others prioritize core values, ideas, aspirations or beliefs. Still, for others, politics may be a reflection of culture, where voting serves as a symbolic act to proclaim cultural group identity. But for some Americans, who they vote for and support is more of a popularity contest,…
-
Federal Reserve policy should be more restrictive
The American economy is booming, with high GDP growth, record-low unemployment, and wage gains for median workers. Over the past few quarters, U.S. economic growth indicators have consistently outperformed official projections. But the U.S. Federal Reserve recently conceded that its policies might be too restrictive, hindering the full potential of the U.S. economy, which the…
-
Celebrate tight labor market, but don’t cut interest rates
While President Joe Biden has been celebrating U.S. economic success, many Americans are still unhappy about the economy. So who’s right? The most recent jobs report for February showed that while the unemployment rate rose slightly to 3.9%, job gains were higher than expected, with the total coming in at 275,000 versus the expected increase…
-
Social and economic class will define 2024 election
Following in the footsteps of FDR, Democratic support in the past hundred years has drawn largely from working-class individuals, labor unions, and civil society organizations. Republican support, conversely, tended to rely upon larger corporate donations and the support of high-income individuals. In 2024, these traditional roles are evolving, and the new reality of campaign finance…
-
Black swan events make next US president difficult to predict
In November, Americans will cast their votes to elect a new president and Congress. Despite significant indicators suggesting dissatisfaction with the economy, posing a challenge for President Biden’s potential reelection, predicting the winner remains challenging due to all the variables at play. Straight Arrow News contributor Larry Lindsey utilizes a recent Gallup poll to offer…
Latest Opinions
-
Argentina asks to join NATO as Milei looks to enhance security, strengthen ties
-
Utah students protest 'furries,' school admin deny problem
-
Trump’s ‘hush money’ trial: Legal experts debate name coined by media.
-
Black Chicagoans feel neglected as millions funneled to migrant crisis
-
Congress wants to curtail ‘judge shopping.’ Can it act before the election?
Popular Opinions
-
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.