Commentary
-
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
When it comes to the latest in liberal news, our eyes and ears so often turn west to the city of San Francisco. And that’s no different today. The city’s official Advisory Committee on Reparations — yeah, you heard me, the city has an official Advisory Committee on Reparations — well this committee has unveiled its recommendations to the Mayor and other city officials. They decided that the city, the city of San Francisco, owes $5 million to each Black resident for decades of discrimination. Now, San Francisco wasn’t a slave state or a slave city, but anyway, discrimination. In explaining their reasoning, the committee’s chair said they landed on that number as a result of a journey, rather than a math formula, in quotes. Yes, they just grabbed a number out of the sky.
Not surprisingly, San Francisco doesn’t have that kind of money. They’re already broke from so many other left-wing policies. And even if they weren’t broke from being woke, they still have no way that they can afford this redistribution handout.
But the problem is not just with the price tag. The problem, most of all, is with the principle of the matter. My ancestors were slaves. And my life as a young woman was a mess. Was my life a mess because my ancestors were slaves? I don’t think so. Did I need reparations to turn things around for me? Certainly not.
I needed a wake up call, which to my great gratitude, I got from a few church going Black Christians who told me the way I was living was unacceptable to God. So I went to their church, took back responsibility for my life and turned my circumstances around. The problem with the idea of reparations is that it redirects attention away from an individual’s responsibility for their own unique lives. And it redirects attention in such a way to encourage individuals to believe that a collective problem from the past is the cause of all their individual problems in the present.
To be sure, compensation of what many referred to as restitution for damages, is a legitimate principle, but only in the very real here and now, not when it’s pushed to the abstract past. And most of the time, it’s in cases where one individual has caused damages against another — in other words, personal responsibility on both sides. After all, one of the main problems with racism is that it denies the uniqueness, the dignity and the personal responsibility of each individual.
And in that sense, reparation is not a counter to racism. They share more in common than one may realize. They both remain dedicated to the past. Slavery, although it never existed in San Francisco was, of course, a horrible, horrible, deplorable sin in our nation’s story. And the Jim Crow laws that followed, everything else that followed, there were sins as well, a lot of it government-induced, government-promoted sin. But in order to heal the present and build the future, we must not forget the principles of freedom that drive us forward, that actually drove us from slavery, the principles of freedom, that every individual, regardless of circumstances, and history, is unique and has free choice. Thus, we have personal responsibility as well. And although, let’s not lie, any of us would be psyched to take the free $5 million, there’s just no price worth our individuality and our personal freedom.
-
Biden using taxpayer dollars to buy voters is indefensible
In July 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned President Biden’s attempt to cancel more than $400 billion in student debt. Biden has since been exploring ways to bypass the ruling. Recently, he announced that over 270,000 individuals enrolled in his income-driven repayment plan (SAVE) will have $7.4 billion in debt canceled. This action brings the…
-
Trump should move ahead with federal abortion bans
Decades-long Republican efforts to roll back abortion access are now paying off in the aftermath of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the Supreme Court ruling which overturned Roe v. Wade. And yet today, an overwhelming majority of Americans say that they believe at least some abortion access should be protected. GOP presidential candidate Donald…
-
Biden’s White House shows hostility toward Christianity on Easter
President Biden and First Lady Jill Biden recently hosted an education-themed Easter egg roll at the White House, while also acknowledging International Transgender Day of Visibility. Some Republicans criticized the White House for banning religious themes from designs in the children’s egg decorating contest. Straight Arrow News contributor Star Parker argues that the White House…
-
Kamala Harris’s abortion clinic visit endorses crime against humanity
Kamala Harris became the first American vice president in history to visit an abortion services provider while in office on Thursday, Mar. 14. That visit was a part of her “Fight for Reproductive Freedoms” tour, which she hopes will mobilize Americans concerned about dwindling access to reproductive healthcare and abortion services. Straight Arrow News contributor…
-
Schumer must stand down on attacks against Israel
On March 14, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-NY, issued a stark warning that Israel was at risk of becoming a “pariah,” and advocated for a new election to replace Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Schumer’s remarks on the Senate floor, notable given his history of unwavering support for the Jewish state, sparked widespread controversy among…
Latest Opinions
-
Argentina asks to join NATO as Milei looks to enhance security, strengthen ties
-
Utah students protest 'furries,' school admin deny problem
-
Trump’s ‘hush money’ trial: Legal experts debate name coined by media.
-
Black Chicagoans feel neglected as millions funneled to migrant crisis
-
Congress wants to curtail ‘judge shopping.’ Can it act before the election?
Popular Opinions
-
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.