Commentary
-
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Donald Trump has finally been subpoenaed by the house committee investigating his attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election results. As much as this subpoena is extraordinary given the circumstances, the former president has never been big on complying with legal mandates so I don’t expect him to comply with this congressional subpoena, either.
And it’s likely that Congress doesn’t expect him to comply. For several reasons, subpoenaing Donald Trump at this point appears to be a mere performative antic that does not advance We The People, but will cost us considerably. Let me explain. As we all know, Trump abuses the legal system – particularly when it comes to dodging accountability. He proffers untenable arguments and makes frivolous claims, drowning his opponents in filing after filing. This strategy is an effective one when it comes to avoiding accountability because it promotes delay.
Over the span of time during which Trump drags his feet in court, seeking continuances and extensions, something very noteworthy happens beyond just amassing legal fees. Power changes. In this situation, the power in Congress is forecasted to change while Trump delays. And that’s what he’s likely hoping for. The midterm elections are right around the corner. Early polls indicate that republicans may take over the House. If that nightmare comes to fruition, do you really think that the House Committee subpoenaing Trump’s involvement in the January 6th insurrection on the U.S. Capitol will continue?
Do you really think GOP representatives will persist in ensuring justice is done here? If so, I have beachfront property in Utah that I would love to show you. Seriously. If republicans take the House come January 2023 when the proverbial “congressional guards” change, the Trump subpoena will be kaput. All Trump needs to do is delay another few months, which will not be hard for numerous reasons.
For instance, case law is murky on the matter of whether a former president has to comply with a Congressional subpoena for actions he engaged in while in office.
Trump’s bound to exploit the holes in the jurisprudence via motions, appeals, Supreme Court petitions. And we know how it can take months, if not years, for our legal system to actually act. Plus, even if his legal challenges are exhausted, it’s going to be exhausting waiting for Attorney General Merrick Garland to decide whether to pursue charges against the former president, especially if he tries to evade congressional subpoenas here.
Remember: Contempt of Congress, it’s a misdemeanor. If the U.S. Attorney isn’t inclined to charge Trump for all of the classified documents he clearly stole, I doubt DOJ would pursue misdemeanor charges against him.
It gave former Trump chief of staff Mark Meadows a pass so I’m sure DOJ would do it for Trump here. All said, I predict Trump will probably just clog the matter in the court system for far longer than the Democrats will control the House.
So in the wake of an anticipated power shift, why did the House Committee wait so damn long to subpoena the former president, knowing good and well that he’s a mastermind of litigious delay and knowing good and well how our justice system works?
I can’t answer that question without speculatively undermining the committee’s true goals here. But I can damn sure tell you that the delay in issuing the subpoena does not seem to serve in the best interests of We the People by advancing accountability as it concerns the attacks on our country. I want to be wrong on that. Then again, whether I am wrong may be a matter of whether those who want to protect our democracy get out and vote blue this November.
-
Supreme Court must end criminalization of homelessness
On April 22, the U.S. Supreme Court addressed the nation’s homelessness crisis, considering whether an Oregon city had the right to ban homeless people from camping in public spaces. A majority of justices appeared inclined to support the city’s efforts to regulate homeless encampments on public grounds. This decision carries significant implications for the growing…
-
Why are non-consensual pelvic exams still happening?
More states are beginning to crack down on the surprisingly common practice of medical students and professional staff performing non-consensual pelvic exams on unconscious men and women in hospitals, universities and other medical facilities. Just one year ago today, those practices remained legal in a majority of U.S. states. Now, however, a new directive from…
-
Congress should repeal the Foreign Dredge Act
The collapse of Baltimore’s Key Bridge presents challenges for cleanup and construction crews who rely on dredging vessels to complete their work. That’s partly because of the Foreign Dredge Act, a 1906 law that prohibits foreign-made dredging vessels. Congress is now introducing a measure to revise parts of that law, although previous attempts to do…
-
Gen Z women must fight for their rights
Gen Z, the first “digital native” U.S. generation, is entering the workforce, studying at university and serving in the military. From school shootings and cyber-bullying to COVID-19 and the overturning of Roe v. Wade, this generation has been shaped by unique trends and events, and how they will behave as citizens and voters is an…
-
Users must have rights in Big Tech’s AI race
Big Tech companies across the board, including Meta, X, Amazon, Microsoft, and Alphabet are racing to draft policies that enable them to use user-generated content to train advanced generative AI models without user permission or compensation. The Federal Trade Commission is investigating where it can, but government regulations lag far behind the rapid pace of…
Latest Opinions
-
How Mexican president’s cheery claims about drug cartels denies reality
-
San Diego labeled the 'new epicenter' of the Southern Border crisis
-
Kim Kardashian attends White House meeting on criminal justice reform
-
José Andrés honors World Central Kitchen aid workers killed in Gaza
-
Testimony continues in Trump's NY trial as SCOTUS debates immunity
Popular Opinions
-
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.