Donald Trump announced in a completely deranged video that on day one of his next presidency, if indeed he wins in November of 2024, he will start violating the Constitution right away. He will waste no time what Trump said Is he will sign an executive order denying US citizenship on a birthright basis. The 14th Amendment says that if you are born in the United States, or any jurisdiction thereof, subject to jurisdiction thereof, you are a citizen. And this has become a major controversy among some on the right who love to use the term anchor babies, or say that we are allowing illegals to come here and birth children and then we can’t kick them out. So right wingers are very excited about this. But I have a word of warning to the right wingers cheerleading the ending of birthright citizenship, because it can bring with it significant unintended consequences. Number one, it does appear that it would violate the Constitution as well as Supreme Court precedent that establishes birthright citizenship as a fundamental right, Trump is saying, Well, we’re going to do it in a way that it doesn’t violate, okay. Legal experts I’ve spoken to say it doesn’t seem there is such a way because this is a fundamental right, it’s part of the Bill of Rights to the Constitution. Secondly, if you do this, it will instantly increase the undocumented population, by virtue of making individuals who previously were were granted legal status here, you’re taking that status away, they say they want to reduce the number of undocumented people here, they would immediately increase it and the right loves to say we care mostly about criminal aliens, the people committing violent crimes, etc. If you instantly by virtue of doing away with birthright citizenship, create an entire new tranche of undocumented immigrants who you now have to find and deport. You are going to dilute the focus on the so called violent criminal illegals that the right says are actually the priority, it will get in their own way of doing the thing they say is most important. Economically, this will have unintended consequences, because it will reduce the labor force, it will reduce the tax base and it will reduce consumer demand. Not only do immigrants documented and undocumented, commit crimes at a lower rate than domestically born American citizens. In addition to that, they both create GDP growth by working and they spend money because they also need housing and food and whatever else the case may be. And then lastly, it would start years of legal challenges that will be both expensive and completely counterproductive. Of course, it should be mentioned that the international image of the United States, we’re we’re viewed as a country that embraces immigrants and offers opportunity to those born within its borders. If we end birthright citizenship internationally, we will damage our reputation as well. And in addition to that, there is a question of whether with national security efforts there would be a concern part of the whole idea of birthright citizenship is if you are born in the United States, you have a vested interest in the country through citizenship. If you create a situation where you are born in the United States, but you lose that legal status here, you create a legal gray area raises questions about rights and obligations of individuals within the country. And it can only be a negative thing. Now if I zoom out for a second, I’ve just made the case for why Trump ending birthright citizenship is a bad idea. And all of the reasons even right wingers should be skeptical about it. But is this even something Trump is really going to do? Do we really believe for a second, that on day one of his presidency, if there is such a presidency in January of 2025, Trump is going to sign an order ending birthright citizenship. I’m not saying he wouldn’t want to do it. But I’m skeptical that he actually will do it partially because he’ll be distracted with other things. Partially because I think even the right wing nuts around him will say this is not actually a great idea. You probably shouldn’t do this. And partially because he will probably be advised that it will create years of legal hell will he try to reinstate the Muslim ban, which he also says he will do that? I do believe I do believe that. That’s something Trump will try to do and we’ll try to do it relatively quickly. Do I believe Trump actually will sign an executive order ending birthright citizenship, I hesitate to think that that’s actually something that he will do. Still, we need to make sure that he and the people around him know how does Astros an idea it is but let me know in the comments do you think this is one Trump will follow through on or like many of the others that he won’t
Related
David Pakman
Host of The David Pakman Show
View Video LibraryCommentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Can other nations replicate success of US shale revolution?
21 hrs ago
Peter Zeihan
Peace between Israel and Iran, at least for now
Yesterday
Peter Zeihan
Global internet in a precarious state, but that could be a positive
Monday
Peter Zeihan
Water wars are an unlikely future
Friday
Peter Zeihan
Trump’s promise to end birthright citizenship is unconstitutional
Jun 05, 2023
By Straight Arrow News
Angering pro-immigration advocates, former President Trump recently promised to issue an executive order repealing birthright citizenship if he returns to the White House. While few constitutional scholars believe Trump would have the power to change birthright citizenship, some say the courts would have to weigh in.
Straight Arrow News contributor David Pakman thinks a Trump executive order on the issue would not only violate the Constitution but also have several other unintended consequences that the Right would not favor kindly.
The 14th Amendment says that if you are born in the United States, or any jurisdiction thereof, subject to a jurisdiction thereof, you are a citizen. And this has become a major controversy among some on the Right who love to use the term “anchor babies,” or say that we are allowing illegals to come here and birth children and then we can’t kick them out. So right-wingers are very excited about this. But I have a word of warning to the right-wingers cheerleading the ending of birthright citizenship because it can bring with it significant unintended consequences.
Number one, it does appear that it would violate the Constitution as well as Supreme Court precedent that establishes birthright citizenship as a fundamental right. Trump is saying, “Well, we’re going to do it in a way that it doesn’t violate…” Okay, legal experts I’ve spoken to say it doesn’t seem there is such a way because this is a fundamental right, it’s part of the Bill of Rights to the Constitution.
Secondly, if you do this it will instantly increase the undocumented population by virtue of making individuals who previously were granted legal status here — you’re taking that status away. They say they want to reduce the number of undocumented people here — they would immediately increase it.
And the Right loves to say we care mostly about criminal aliens, the people committing violent crimes, et cetera. If you instantly, by virtue of doing away with birthright citizenship, create an entire new tranche of undocumented immigrants who you now have to find and deport, you are going to dilute the focus on the so-called violent criminal illegals that the Right says are actually the priority. It will get in their own way of doing the thing they say is most important.
Economically, this will have unintended consequences because it will reduce the labor force, it will reduce the tax base and it will reduce consumer demand. Not only do immigrants, documented and undocumented, commit crimes at a lower rate than domestically-born American citizens, in addition to that, they both create GDP growth by working and they spend money because they also need housing and food and whatever else the case may be.
And then lastly, it would start years of legal challenges that will be both expensive and completely counterproductive.
Donald Trump announced in a completely deranged video that on day one of his next presidency, if indeed he wins in November of 2024, he will start violating the Constitution right away. He will waste no time what Trump said Is he will sign an executive order denying US citizenship on a birthright basis. The 14th Amendment says that if you are born in the United States, or any jurisdiction thereof, subject to jurisdiction thereof, you are a citizen. And this has become a major controversy among some on the right who love to use the term anchor babies, or say that we are allowing illegals to come here and birth children and then we can’t kick them out. So right wingers are very excited about this. But I have a word of warning to the right wingers cheerleading the ending of birthright citizenship, because it can bring with it significant unintended consequences. Number one, it does appear that it would violate the Constitution as well as Supreme Court precedent that establishes birthright citizenship as a fundamental right, Trump is saying, Well, we’re going to do it in a way that it doesn’t violate, okay. Legal experts I’ve spoken to say it doesn’t seem there is such a way because this is a fundamental right, it’s part of the Bill of Rights to the Constitution. Secondly, if you do this, it will instantly increase the undocumented population, by virtue of making individuals who previously were were granted legal status here, you’re taking that status away, they say they want to reduce the number of undocumented people here, they would immediately increase it and the right loves to say we care mostly about criminal aliens, the people committing violent crimes, etc. If you instantly by virtue of doing away with birthright citizenship, create an entire new tranche of undocumented immigrants who you now have to find and deport. You are going to dilute the focus on the so called violent criminal illegals that the right says are actually the priority, it will get in their own way of doing the thing they say is most important. Economically, this will have unintended consequences, because it will reduce the labor force, it will reduce the tax base and it will reduce consumer demand. Not only do immigrants documented and undocumented, commit crimes at a lower rate than domestically born American citizens. In addition to that, they both create GDP growth by working and they spend money because they also need housing and food and whatever else the case may be. And then lastly, it would start years of legal challenges that will be both expensive and completely counterproductive. Of course, it should be mentioned that the international image of the United States, we’re we’re viewed as a country that embraces immigrants and offers opportunity to those born within its borders. If we end birthright citizenship internationally, we will damage our reputation as well. And in addition to that, there is a question of whether with national security efforts there would be a concern part of the whole idea of birthright citizenship is if you are born in the United States, you have a vested interest in the country through citizenship. If you create a situation where you are born in the United States, but you lose that legal status here, you create a legal gray area raises questions about rights and obligations of individuals within the country. And it can only be a negative thing. Now if I zoom out for a second, I’ve just made the case for why Trump ending birthright citizenship is a bad idea. And all of the reasons even right wingers should be skeptical about it. But is this even something Trump is really going to do? Do we really believe for a second, that on day one of his presidency, if there is such a presidency in January of 2025, Trump is going to sign an order ending birthright citizenship. I’m not saying he wouldn’t want to do it. But I’m skeptical that he actually will do it partially because he’ll be distracted with other things. Partially because I think even the right wing nuts around him will say this is not actually a great idea. You probably shouldn’t do this. And partially because he will probably be advised that it will create years of legal hell will he try to reinstate the Muslim ban, which he also says he will do that? I do believe I do believe that. That’s something Trump will try to do and we’ll try to do it relatively quickly. Do I believe Trump actually will sign an executive order ending birthright citizenship, I hesitate to think that that’s actually something that he will do. Still, we need to make sure that he and the people around him know how does Astros an idea it is but let me know in the comments do you think this is one Trump will follow through on or like many of the others that he won’t
Related
As trials persist, Trump will become increasingly unhinged
On Monday, April 22, former President Donald Trump is scheduled to appear in a New York court for the start of opening statements in his hush money criminal trial. Trump faces 34 felony charges of falsifying business records related to an alleged scheme aimed at suppressing negative information prior to the 2016 election. Despite this…
Monday
RFK’s true goal is to elect Donald Trump
When Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. announced his intention to run as a presidential candidate, many Americans assumed that he would run as a Democrat. But some of his political positions, including his opposition to vaccines and mask mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic, aligned him more with Donald Trump’s MAGA camp. In the end, Kennedy chose…
Apr 15
Courts must end special treatment for criminal Trump
A New York appeals court reduced Donald Trump’s bond payment from $464 million to $175 million on Mar. 25. The reduction came after Trump had already been allowed significant delays in numerous court cases. The former president faces a total of 91 felony criminal charges and could theoretically face a prison sentence of over seven…
Apr 8
Biden could beat Trump even without Florida
In March, former President Donald Trump easily won Florida’s GOP primary, clinching all 125 delegates. While numerous strategists saw the romp as another sign of Trump’s unwavering GOP dominance, some noted his support among the state’s Republican voters may not be as strong as before. Despite Trump’s success, other names on the ballot, such as…
Apr 1
GOP’s Biden investigation still has no evidence, no crime
In December 2023, House Republicans voted to open an impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden to determine if he “improperly benefited” from his son’s alleged business deals. President Biden quickly fired back, stating that House Republicans were “choosing to waste time on this baseless political stunt” instead of doing their jobs. Straight Arrow News contributor…
Mar 25
Underreported stories from each side
Facebook has ‘interfered’ with US elections 39 times since 2008: study
11 sources | 0% from the left
Haley attracts more than 150K votes in Pennsylvania GOP primary, weeks after dropping bid
19 sources | 11% from the right
Reuters
Latest Stories
Trump to attend NY trial as US Supreme Court hears immunity case
Watch 6:22
8 mins ago
Supreme Court justices split over Idaho’s abortion law
Watch 2:55
13 hrs ago
Businesses sue over FTC ban on noncompetes
Watch 1:53
14 hrs ago
National Enquirer ex-publisher: Tabloid made up stories to help Trump
Watch 2:04
15 hrs ago
Bird flu fallout: USDA says milk is safe, states must test dairy herds
Watch 1:14
15 hrs ago
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Supreme Court must end criminalization of homelessness
19 hrs ago
Adrienne Lawrence
How AI is changing the world
21 hrs ago
Newt Gingrich
Biden greenlit Iranian strike on Israel
Yesterday
Ben Weingarten
Trump supporters want to be victims of anti-white racism
Yesterday
Ruben Navarrette